Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Madhu, M.
- Assessment of Soil Conservation Efficiencies of Selected Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in Nilgiris
Abstract Views :272 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 130, No 12 (2004), Pagination: 1444-1450Abstract
A study was conducted to quantify runoff and soil loss under the cultivation of prominent medicinal and aromatic plants in the high hills of Nilgiris, in order to assess their relative soil and water conservation efficiencies. Six species, namely Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) , Cineraria (Ceneraria maritima), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris), Mentha (Mentha piperita) and Digitalis (Digitalis purpurea) were planted in 15 m × 5 m plots on 15 percent land slope. Geranium recorded highest average green biomass yield followed by Digitalis, Cineraria, Mentha and Rosemary. Runoff and soil loss was maximum under Thyme followed by Cineraria because of their poor canopy cover. The lowest average annual soil loss and run off, over four years, was observed from Digitalis followed by Mentha and Geranium due to their quick establishment and higher canopy coverage. Relative Soil and Water Conservation Efficiency (RSWCE) varied from 36.4 per cent under Cineraria to 96.6 percent under Digitalis with Mentha, Geranium and Rosemary registering RSWCE of 95.1, 88.4 and 87.8 percent, respectively. It is suggested that Digitalis, Mentha, Geranium and Rosemary cultivation could be the best options for a diversified land use system as well as for cover crop, intercrop and vegetative barrier in the Nilgiris for effective soil conservation.- Development and Validation of UV-Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Cephalexin
Abstract Views :572 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
G. Venkata Prasad
1,
S. Sravani
1,
B. Mohammed Ishaq
1,
M. Madhu
1,
Sreenivasulu Munna
1,
C. Gopinath
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Annamacharya college of Pharmacy, Rajampet, Kadapa Dist, A.P, IN
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Annamacharya college of Pharmacy, Rajampet, Kadapa Dist, A.P, IN
Source
Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, Vol 6, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 490-494Abstract
To develop simple, sensitive, selective and accurate UV Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Cephalexin in bulk drug and pharmaceutical formulations (Capsules). The absorbances were measured at 261(Method A) and 257 nm (Method B). The methods was found to be linear from a quantitation ranges of 5μg/ml to 40μg/ml (Method A) in Phosphate Buffer pH 2.0 and 5μg/ml to 50μg/ml (Method B) in 0.1 N HCl. The regression of the curves was Y = 0.020x - 0.021 (Method A) and Y = 0.014x - 0.102 (Method B). The methods gave satisfactory results in terms of repeatability and intermediate precision (RSD<1.010%) (Method A) and (RSD<0.589%) (Method B) 0.855 μg/mL and 2.85 μg/mL (Method A) and 2.357 μg/mL and 7.857 μg/mL were the LOD and LOQ values, respectively. The methods was validated and proved to be robust and rugged. The results of analysis for these methods have been validated statistically and by recovery studies.Keywords
Cephalexin, Spectroscopic Method, Phosphate Buffer (Ph 2.0), 0.1 N HclReferences
- The United States Pharmacopoeia XXIII. 1993. United States Pharmacopoeia Convection. Rockville, Maryland, U. S. A.
- Agbaba D. et al., HPTLC assay of cephalexin and cefaclor in pharmaceuticals. Biomedical Chromatography, 1998, 12, 133- 135.
- Halkar U.P. and Bhandari N.P. Simultaneous determination of cephalexin and probenecid in pharmaceutical preparations by HPTLC. Indian Drugs, 1998, 35, 382–383.
- Coran S.A. et. al., Development of a densitometry method for the determination of cephalexin as an alternative to the standard HPLC procedure. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis., 1998, 18, 271–274.
- Bhooshan R. and Prashad V., Separation and Identification of Some Cephalosporin’s on Impregnated TLC Plates., Biomedical Chromatography, 1996, 10, 258–260.
- Najib N. M. et. al., High performance liquid chromatographic analysis of cephalexin in serum and urine., Journal of Clinial pharmacy and therapeutics, 2008, 12, 419-426.
- Zendelovska D. et. Al., Simultaneous quantification of cefaclor and cephalexine in bloodplasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection., Acta Pharm,2002, 52, 243– 250.
- Lee Y.J. and Lee H.S., Simultaneous determination of cefoxitin, cefuroxime, cephalexin and cephaloridine in plasma using HPLC and a column-switching technique. Chromatographia, 1990, 30, 80–84.
- Prayanka P. and Suresh P., Development of colorimetric method for cephalexin in dosage forms, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2008, 2, 120–122.
- Patel S.A. et. al., Spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of Cephalexin in tablet dosage forms., Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2006, 68, 278-280.
- Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text And Methodology Q1A (R2), ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Feb 2003.
- Green J M, A practical guide to analytical method validation, Analytical Chemistry: 1996, 305A.
- Dry Matter Partitioning and Growth Analysis of Soybean Grown under Elevated CO2 and Soil Moisture Levels
Abstract Views :286 |
PDF Views:98
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Sunabeda, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa 50011, US
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Sunabeda, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa 50011, US
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 6 (2016), Pagination: 981-984Abstract
The growth of plants is influenced by above- and below-ground environmental conditions. Elevated CO2 tends to enhance growth and yield of majority of the agricultural plants and generally increase plant productivity and water-use efficiency. However, the long-term response depends on environmental constraints. It is expected to increase the incidence of extreme weather events, viz. heat waves, heavy rains, drought, floods, etc. making agricultural production more unpredictable and difficult due to climate change.- 'Thang Bun’: Indigenous Practice of In Situ Biochar Preparation-cum-application for Improved Jhum Cultivation in North East India
Abstract Views :354 |
PDF Views:125
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 ICAR-Central Institute for Women in Agriculture, Bhubaneswar 751 003, IN
3 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam 793 103, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 ICAR-Central Institute for Women in Agriculture, Bhubaneswar 751 003, IN
3 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam 793 103, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 7 (2021), Pagination: 1160-1168Abstract
Thang bun is a traditional agricultural method practised by ethnic communities in Meghalaya, India. This method produces and incorporates biochar in the soil on raised beds from slashed plant biomass while practicing jhumming (slash and burn agriculture). The biochar prepared and incorporated into jhum soils acts as an acid-neutralizing agent and improves physico-chemical properties in acidic soils. This practice highlights the knowledge of ethnic communities on biochar preparation as well as soil fertility management using locally available resources for improving crop performance. This low-cost traditional technology is used to convert surplus slashed biomass into biochar through which the soil is enriched with nutrients, especially potassium and large quantities of carbon is sequestered annually. This traditional practice is the best example of a carbon-negative technology and effective utilization of locally available resources for better crop production. This practice has thrived for several centuries due to its multi-fold significance, minimum degrade effects and higher productive output. Presently, a scientifically modified version of this practice can be adopted for acid soil management in north east hill region of India.Keywords
Biochar Preparation, Ethnic Communities Deforestation, Indigenous Farming Practice, Jhum Cultivation.References
- Brookfield, H. and Padoch, C., Appreciating agrodiversity: a look at the dynamism and diversity of indigenous farming practices. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Develop., 1994, 36(5), 6–45.
- Padoch, C., Harwell, E. and Sustanto, A., Swidden, sawah, and in-between: agricultural transformation in Borneo. Hum. Ecol., 1998, 26, 3–20.
- Laurance, W. F., Forest destruction in tropical Asia. Curr. Sci., 2007, 93, 1544–1550.
- Lele, N. and Joshi, P. K., Analyzing deforestation rates, spatial forest cover changes and identifying critical areas of forest cover changes in North-East India during 1972–1999. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2009, 156(1–4), 159.
- Myers, N., Tropical forests: the main deforestation fronts. Environ. Conserv., 1993, 20, 9–16.
- Toky, O. P. and Ramakrishnan, P. S., Secondary succession following slash and burn agriculture in North-Eastern India: I. Biomass, litterfall and productivity. J. Ecol., 1983, 71, 735–745.
- Hombegowda, H. C., Jakhar, P., Beer, K. and Madhu, M., Status of organic carbon recovery under different fallow periods of shifting cultivated sites in Central Eastern Ghats, India. In Soil and Water Resource Management for Climate Smart Agriculture, Global Food and Livelihood Security, International Conference, Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, 2019, pp. 127–132.
- Ramakrishnan, P. S., The science behind rotational bush fallow agriculture system (jhum). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.), 1984, 93, 379–400.
- Toky, O. P. and Ramakrishnan, P. S., Cropping and yields in agricultural systems of the northeastern hill region of India. AgroEcosyst., 1981, 7, 11–25.
- Wasteland Atlas of India, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Hyderabad and Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi, 2019, pp. 1–246.
- Hombegowda, H. C., Adhikary, P. P., Jakhar, P., Madhu, M. and Barman, D., Hedge row intercropping impact on run-off, soil erosion, carbon sequestration and millet yield. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 2020, 116(1), 103–116.
- Madhu, M., Hombegowda, H. C., Meena, M. K. and Barla, G. W., Shifting cultivation in Odisha state: issues and challenges. ICARIndian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Technology Broucher PP-02/KR/E-2016, 2016, pp. 1–33.
- Mishra, B. K. and Ramakrishnan, P. S., Slash and burn agriculture at higher elevations in north-eastern India. I. Sediment, water and nutrient losses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 1983, 9(1), 69–82.
- Singh, A. and Singh, M. D., Effect of various stages of shifting cultivation on soil erosion from steep hill slopes. Indian For., 1981, 106(2), 115–121.
- Adhikary, P. P. et al., Land use and land cover dynamics with special emphasis on shifting cultivation in Eastern Ghats Highlands of India using remote sensing data and GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2019, 191(5), 315.
- Juo, A. S. and Manu, A., Chemical dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 1996, 58(1), 49–60.
- Majumdar, B., Satapathy, K. K., Kumar, K. and Patiram, Changes in soil properties under bun cultivation in acidic hill soil of Meghalaya. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2002, 50(1), 130–132.
- Moran, E. F., Socio-economic aspects of acid soil management. In Plant –Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995, pp. 663–669.
- Andriesse, J. P. and Koopmans, T. T., A monitoring study on nutrient cycles in soils used for shifting cultivation under various climatic conditions in tropical Asia. I. The influence of simulated burning on form and availability of plant nutrients. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 1984, 12, 1–16.
- Thomaz, E. L., High fire temperature changes soil aggregate stability in slash-and-burn agricultural systems. Sci. Agricola, 2017, 74(2), 157–162.
- Chhetry, G. K. N. and Belbahri, L., Indigenous pest and disease management practices in traditional farming systems in north east India –a review. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci., 2009, 1(3), 28–38.
- Upadhaya, K., Barik, S. K., Kharbhih, V. M., Nongbri, G., Debnath, G., Gupta, A. and Ojha, A., Traditional bun shifting cultivation practice in Meghalaya, Northeast India. Energy, Ecol. Environ., 2020, 5(1), 34–46.
- Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D. and Hipps, N. A., Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil, 2010, 337 (1–2), 1–18.
- Chintalaa, R., Mollinedo, J., Schumacher, T. E., Malo, D. D. and Julsonb, J. L., Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2014, 60(3), 393–404; doi:10.1080/ 03650340.2013.789870.
- Jien, S. H. and Wang, C. S., Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena, 2013, 110, 225–233.
- Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C. and Crowley, D., Biochar effects on soil biota –a review. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2011, 43, 1812–1836.
- Xu, R. K., Zhao, A. Z., Yuan, J. H. and Jiang, J., pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. J. Soils Sediments, 2012, 12(4), 494–502.
- McCann, J. M., Woods, W. I. and Meyer, D. W., Organic matter and anthrosols in Amazonia: interpreting the Amerindian legacy. In Sustainable Management of Soil Organic Matter (eds Rees, R. M. et al.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2001, pp. 180–189.
- Glaser, B., Haumaier, L., Guggenberger, G. and Zech, W., The terra preta phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics. Naturwissenschaften, 2001, 88(1), 37–41.
- Eden, M. J., Bray, W., Herrera, L. and McEwan, C., Terra preta soils and their archaeological context in the Caquetá basin of southeast Colombia. Am. Antiq., 1984, 125–140.
- Sheil, D. et al., Do anthropogenic dark earths occur in the interior of Borneo? Some initial observations from East Kalimantan. Forests, 2012, 3(2), 207–229.
- Downie, A. E., Van Zwieten, L., Smernik, R. J., Morris, S. and Munroe, P. R., Terra Preta Australis: reassessing the carbon storage capacity of temperate soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2011, 140(1–2), 137–147.
- Fearnside, P. M., Greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In Carbon Emissions and Sequestration in Forests: Case Studies from Seven Developing Countries, Report. LBL-32119, US Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division (eds Makundi, W., Sathaye, J. and Masera, O.), Washington, DC, and Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Energy and Environment Division, Berkeley, California, USA, 1992, pp. 36–47.
- Woods, W. I. and McCann, J. M., The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian dark earths. Yearb. Conf. Latin Am. Geogr., 1999, 25, 7–14.
- Saplalrinliana, H., Thakuria, D., Changkija, S. and Hazarika, S., Impact of shifting cultivation on litter accumulation and properties of jhum soils of North East India. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2016, 64(4), 402–413.
- Karer, J., Wimmer, B., Zehetner, F., Kloss, S. and Soja, G., Biochar application to temperate soils: effects on nutrient uptake and crop yield under field conditions. Agric. Food Sci., 2013, 22, 390–403.
- Yuan, J. H., Xu, R. K., Wang, N. and Li, J. Y., Amendment of acid soils with crop residues and biochars. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(3), 302–308.
- Obia, A., Cornelissen, G., Mulder, J. and Dorsch, P., Effect of soil pH increase by biochar on NO, N2O and N2 production during denitrification in acid soils. PLoS ONE, 2015, 23, 10(9), e0138781.
- Boersma, M., Wrobel-Tobiszewskab, A., Murphya, L. and Eyles, A., Impact of biochar application on the productivity of a temperate vegetable cropping system. N.Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 2017, 45(4), 277–288; doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2017.1329745.
- Obia, A., Mulder, J., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G. and Borresen, T., In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil Till. Res., 2016, 1(155), 35–44.
- Sun, F. and Lu, S., Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-size properties of clayey soil. J. Plant Soil Sci., 2014, 177(7), 26–33.
- Kolb, S. E., Fermanich, K. J. and Dornbush, M. E., Effect of charcoal quantity on microbial biomass and activity in temperate soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2019, 73, 1173–1181.
- Xu, N., Tan, G., Wang, H. and Gai, X., Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial structure. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2016, 74, 1–8.
- Li, Z. G. et al., The benefic effect induced by biochar on soil erosion and nutrient loss of slopping land under natural rainfall conditions in central China. Agric. Water Manage., 2017, 185, 145–150.
- Peng, X., Zhu, Q. H., Xie, Z. B., Darboux, F. and Holden, N. M., The impact of manure, straw and biochar amendments on aggregation and erosion in a hillslope Ultisol. Catena, 2016, 138, 30–37.
- Why Nudging Farmers for Volunteer Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Technologies in Rainfed Areas of India is Challenging?
Abstract Views :212 |
PDF Views:91
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Insti-tute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Insti-tute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 12 (2021), Pagination: 1533-1535Abstract
No Abstract.Keywords
No Keywords.References
- Wani, S. P., Rockström, J. and Oweis, T. Y. (eds), Rainfed Agriculture: Unlocking the Potential (Vol. 7), CABI, Oxfordshire, UK, 2009.
- Raghavendra, K. J. and Suresh, A., Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88(6), 895–901.
- Reddy, D. N., Reddy, A. A., Nagaraj, N. and Bantilan, M. C. S., Rural Non-Farm Employment and Rural Transformation
- in India, Working Paper Series No. 57, International Crops Research Institute for The Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Hyderabad, 2014.
- Chand, R., Srivastava, S. K. and Singh, J., Changing Structure of Rural Economy of India Implications for Employment and Growth, Discussion Paper, NITI Aayog, New Delhi, 2017.
- Agrawal, T. and Chandrasekha, S., Short Term Migrants in India: Characteristics, Wages and Work Transition, Working Paper No. 7, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, 2015.
- Smith, P., The use of subsidies for soil and water conservation: a case study from western India, Network Paper No.
- , Agricultural Research & Extension Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 1998.
- Bunch, R., Mt. Res. Dev., 1999, 9(3), 213– 219.
- Kumar et al., Economics and soil and water conservation in rainfed areas of Karnataka, Ph.D. thesis, Division of Agricultural Economics, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, 2020.
- Paltasingh, K. R., Land Use Policy, 2018, 78, 236–244.
- Gulati, A. and Juneja, R., Transforming Indian Agriculture, Discussion Paper in National Dialogue, Indian Agriculture towards 2030: Pathways for Enhancing Farmers’ Income, Nutritional Security and Sustainable Food Systems, 2021; http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/FAOcountries/India/docs/Full_Paper-1.pdf
- Kannan, K., Srivastava, R. C. S., Mohanty, M. and Sahoo, N., Indian J. Soil Conserv., 2004, 32, 225–227.
- Tracing the trajectory of watershed development in India using watershed guidelines: policy insights
Abstract Views :143 |
PDF Views:66
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, India, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195, India, IN
3 ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, India, IN
4 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Kota 324 002, India, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput 763 002, India, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195, India, IN
3 ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, India, IN
4 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Kota 324 002, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 8 (2022), Pagination: 968-974Abstract
This study traces the development of watersheds in India based on the governing guidelines of the watershed programmes. We explore the changes and modifications in the watershed guidelines and categorize the developmental changes into six distinct yet interlinked phases. We observed that the watershed guidelines were fine-tuned with emerging challenges of land degradation, livelihood security, gender and social equity, climate change mitigation and adaptations. Recently, the focus of watersheds has shifted from production centric to income-centric by promoting enabling institutional settings. The experiences and learnings from India’s watershed programmes provide insights for other developing countries implementing such programmesReferences
- Rao, C. S. et al., Potential and challenges of rainfed farming in India. Adv. Agron., 2015, 133, 113–118.
- Sengupta, S., Mitra, K., Saigal, S., Gupta, R., Tiwari, S. and Peters, N., Developing markets for watershed protection services and improved livelihoods in India. Winrock International India, New Delhi. Discussion paper, 2003, p. 116; https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.620.1645&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Rockström, J. et al., Managing water in rain-fed agriculture. In Water for Food, Water for Life. A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (ed. Molden, D.), Earthscan, London, UK, 2007, pp. 315–352.
- Wani, S. P., Joshi, P. K., Ramakrishna, Y. S., Sreedevi, T. K., Singh, P. and Pathak, P., A new paradigm in watershed management: a must for development of rain-fed areas for inclusive growth. In Conservation Farming: Enhancing Productivity and Profitability of Rain-fed Areas (eds Swarup, A., Bhan, S. and Bali, J. S.), Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, 2007, pp. 163–178.
- Shiferaw, B., Wani, S. P. and Nageswara Rao, G. D., Irrigation investments and groundwater depletion in the Indian semi-arid villages: the effect of alternative water pricing regimes, Socio-economics and Policy Working Paper 17, ICRISAT, Patancheru, 2003, p. 24.
- Shankar, P. V., Towards a paradigm shift in India’s rainfed agriculture. Innov. Dev., 2011, 1(2), 321–322.
- Reddy, V. R., Saharawat, Y. S. and George, B., Watershed management in South Asia: a synoptic review. J. Hydrol., 2017, 551, 4–13.
- TERI, Impact assessment study of the watershed development programme – a compendium. The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, 2004; https://dolr.gov.in/sites/default/files/impact_assissment_in_watershed_in_india.pdf
- Fan, S. and Hazell, P., Should developing countries invest more in less-favoured areas? An empirical analysis of rural India. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2000, 1455–1464.
- Kerr, J., Milne, G., Chhotray, V., Baumann, P., and James, A. J., Managing watershed externalities in India: theory and practice. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2006, 9(3), 263–281.
- Wani, S. P., Bright spots in rainfed Asia for minimizing land degradation in watersheds: drivers and speed breakers. Presentation in Bright Spots Meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, 15 February 2003.
- Farrington, J., Turton, C. and James, A. J. (eds), Participatory Water-shed Development: Challenges for the Twenty First Century, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1999, p. 382.
- Seeley, J., Batra, M. and Sarin, M., Women’s participation in water-shed development in India, Gatekeeper Series No. 92, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD, UK, 2000, p. 20.
- Deshpande, R. S. and Narayanamoorthy, A., Irrigation sector in Maharashtra: some policy-related aspects. Water Resour. J., 1999, 200, 72–82.
- Sreedevi, T. K., Wani, S. P. and Nageswara Rao, V., Empowerment of women for equitable participation in watershed management for improved livelihoods and sustainable development: an analytical study. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India, 2007, p. 20.
- Shah, A. C., Eloquent silent revolution. Development Support Centre, Ahmedabad, 2000, p. 29.
- Angurana, A. K., Gender orientation to watershed development in Jharkhand. J. Dev. Manage. Stud., 2003, 1(3), 393–395.
- Rao, C. H., Watershed development in India: recent experience and emerging issues. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2000, 3943–3947.
- Shiferaw, B. and Rao, K. P. C., Integrated management of water-sheds for agricultural diversification and sustainable livelihoods in eastern and central Africa: lessons and experiences from semi-arid South Asia. Proceedings of the International Workshop, ICRISAT, Nairobi, 2006, p. 120.
- Agarwal, A. and Narain, S., Making water management everybody’s business: water harvesting and rural development in India. The Gatekeepers Series No. 87, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD, UK, 1999, p. 20.
- Kerr, J., Pangare, G. and Pangare, V., Watershed development project in India: an evaluation research report no. 127. Environment and Policy Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, p. 102.
- MoRD, Annual Report 2006–07, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India (GoI), 2007.
- Hanumantha Rao Committee, A report of the Committee appointed for review of rural development programmes in India, GoI, 1994, p. 65; https://dolr.gov.in/sites/default/files/TechCommitteeReport1994.pdf
- GoI, Watershed development guidelines-revised, Government of India, 2001; https://megcnrd.gov.in/forms/WSD.pdf
- Baumann, P., Panchayati Raj and Watershed Management in India: constraints and opportunities. Working Paper 114. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 1998, p. 77.
- Hooja, R., Why only Panchayats? Down to Earth, 2004, 12(18), 15–16; https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/governance/the-development-laboratory-10991.
- Singh, S., Comparative study of common guidelines for watershed development programme in India. J. Global Econ., 2010, 6(2), 137–148.
- MoRD, Guidelines for Hariyali. Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, GoI, 2003, p. 11; https://megsoil.gov.in/docs/HARAYALI_Guidelines.pdf
- GoI, Common guidelines for watershed development projects, Government of India, 2008; https://dolr.gov.in/sites/default/files/CommonGuidelines2008.pdf
- GoI, Common guidelines for watershed development projects, revised edition, Government of India, 2011; https://dolr.gov.in/sites/default/files/Common%20Guidelines%20for%20WDP%202008%-20Revised%20Edition%202011.pdf
- Symle, J., Lobo, C., Milne, G. and Williams, M., Watershed development in India: an approach evolving through experience. Agriculture and Environmental Services Discussion Paper 4, 2014, p. 81; https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18636/880560NWP0Wate0Box385209B00PUIBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1&is-Allowed=y
- MoRD, Guidelines for new generation watershed development projects (WDC-PMKSY 2.0). Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, GoI, 2021.